#Everspace 2 rigged asteroid crack#

My belief is that Hubble is just another piece of fairy tale hardware like moon buggies and Mars rovers. At the bottom I conclude with a request and suggestion for continuing this part of the conversation. That conversation starts here, but there is more in the comments section below that about other topics as well. Here I’ll paste the most recent and relevant comments related to the question of whether it is even possible to lift heavy objects (like the Hubble telescope) into space. Keep in mind that promotion of Flat Earth in this thread will be grounds for immediate suspension of commenting privileges. He is the one who created the fake space image above using compositing.

There was a long discussion in the comments of the ‘Defense of Miles Mathis’ thread (I would say it kicks off right around this comment here), and so at Jared’s suggestion I decided to devote a new post for discussion about these types of issues.

#Everspace 2 rigged asteroid crack#

But perhaps the readers of this blog would like to take a crack at it. Nor am I willing to just throw my hands up and declare it all fake. Honestly, I’ve never really cared enough about this issue to really dig in to it and try to figure out where is the frontier between lies and truth. But in other cases, it isn’t because the inferential leap is much smaller and usually more logical.” And even if all footage is faked, it doesn’t necessarily follow that the Earth is flat or that NASA can’t even so much as launch a satellite into space. In those examples, it’s very easy to see how the conclusions do not follow from the premises. Just because some NASA footage is faked, doesn’t necessarily mean that all footage is faked. They are using that imagery (and, I now suspect, deliberately creating obviously fake imagery) in order to misdirect people into the Flat Earth fantasy land. Here is how I put it in the past: “We see the same thing with faked NASA imagery. If “Operation Fantasy Land” is a thing, then it means that fake imagery can be produced on purpose even if the thing it supposedly depicts is real. But does that mean, for example, that all of the ISS imagery is faked? That nobody is really up in that tin can? Does it mean that there is no ISS and the thing we can observe through our backyard telescopes zooming through the sky is an elaborate hoax? Could be. And I’ve also seen enough analysis of some footage from ISS to know there is fakery afoot there. I’m damned certain that Space-X didn’t launch a car into space on its way to Mars, and I’m nearly certain the Apollo imagery of men walking and riding on the moon was all faked. While I personally don’t believe either of those things are true, I could not really pinpoint where the lies end and the truth begins.

Once a person comes to the realization that they have been surrounded their entire lives with an endless menagerie of lies, it is easier to convince them that the Earth is flat or that rockets can’t work in a vacuum and therefore we’ve never launched anything into space. One method of misdirection is to take it too far and lead us off into fantasy land, where we throw the baby of truth out with the bathwater of lies. I have written in the past about what I call “Operation Fantasy Land.” I surmised that to the extent that Intelligence has been promoting and publicizing analysis of media fakery (and even creating an entire clueless forum devoted to the topic), they are using it to misdirect.